Predictors of Vaccine Hesitancy among Health Care Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Most studies of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among health care workers (HCWs) have been descriptive, few have tested models to predict hesitancy, and none have examined the possible relationship between HCWs' distress and vaccine hesitancy. This study examined predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, including HCWs' distress after taking into account HCW sex, doctoral-level status, race, age, and exposure to COVID-19. Further, it examined specific reasons HCWs endorsed for their hesitancy. 266 HCWs in the United States (U.S.). completed an online survey administered in January 2021, following the availability of the vaccine for HCWs in the U.S. The survey assessed demographics, depression, anxiety, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, and reasons for hesitancy. A comprehensive linear regression model explained 72.2% of the variance in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. HCWs were more hesitant if they did not know someone personally who had tested positive. Distress had no effect. The reasons most predicting vaccine hesitancy included safety, potential side effects, believing the risks from COVID-19 were lower than from the vaccine, not feeling at risk for getting COVID-19, and current pregnancy. Rather than rely on providing information about the COVID-19 vaccines to HCWs, strategies that address their concerns are required to promote vaccine acceptance. Contemporary issues of political polarization, misinformation and mistrust are likely to contribute to the concerns HCWs have about the COVID-19 vaccines.

Resilience, coping, and distress among healthcare service personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has a detrimental effect on the health and well-being of health care workers (HCWs). The extent to which HCWs may differ in their experience of depression and anxiety is unclear, and longitudinal studies are lacking. The present study examined theorized differences in distress between resilient and non-resilient HCWs over time, as reported in a national online survey. We also examined possible differences in distress as a function of sex and doctoral-level status. METHODS: A national sample responded to an online survey data that included the study measures. Of the HCWs who responded, 666 had useable data at the two time points. A longitudinal structural equation model tested an a priori model that specified the relationship of a resilient personality prototype to self-reported resilience, coping, depression and anxiety at both measurement occasions. Additional invariance models examined possible differences by sex and doctoral-level status. RESULTS: The final model explained 46.4% of the variance in psychological distress at Time 1 and 69.1% at Time 2. A non-resilient personality prototype predicted greater depression and anxiety. A resilient personality prototype was predictive of and operated through self-reported resilience and less disengaged coping to effect lower distress. No effects were found for active coping, however. The final model was generally invariant by sex and HCWs status. Additional analyses revealed that non-doctoral level HCWs had significantly higher depression and anxiety than doctoral-level HCWs on both occasions. CONCLUSIONS: HCWs differ in their susceptibility to distress imposed by COVID-19. Those who are particularly vulnerable may have characteristics that contribute to a lower sense of confidence and efficacy in stressful situations, and more likely to rely on ineffective, disengaged coping behaviors that can exacerbate stress levels. Individual interventions and institutional policies may be implemented to support HCWs at risk.

The COVID-19 Pandemic's Influence on Family Systems Therapists' Provision of Teletherapy.

The COVID-19 pandemic has altered life globally like no other event in modern history, and psychological service changes to meet the resultant impacts on families have not been assessed in the empirical literature. The purpose of the current study was to examine whether family systems therapists increased their teletherapy use during the pandemic relative to prepandemic usage, and whether projected postpandemic rates would remain at the same level; further, environmental and demographic predictors of these changes were examined. In May 2020, a sample of 626 family systems therapists (58.6% women, 40.6% men; M = 57.4 years old; M years in practice = 25.5) completed a national online study assessing these variables. Results suggested that family systems therapists performed 7.92% of their clinical work using teletherapy before the pandemic and 88.17% during the pandemic. They also projected that they would perform 36.57% of their clinical work using teletherapy after the pandemic. Teletherapy uptake was unrelated to primary practice setting, provider age, gender, race/ethnicity, and practice location (urban/suburban vs. rural) but was higher for family systems therapists who reported increased supportive teletherapy policies and training in their practice setting. Organizational infrastructure and availability of training played an important role in influencing teletherapy uptake during the pandemic. Family systems therapists have a unique opportunity to deploy teletherapy modalities to meet the needs of families during the COVID-19 pandemic, and infrastructure and training to do so may facilitate that work.

La pandemia de la COVID-19 ha alterado la vida a nivel mundial como ningún otro acontecimiento de la historia moderna, y los cambios en el servicio psicológico para atender los efectos resultantes en las familias no se han evaluado en las publicaciones empíricas. El propósito del presente estudio fue analizar si los terapeutas de sistemas familiares aumentaron el uso de la teleterapia durante la pandemia en comparación con el uso previo a la pandemia, y si los índices previstos para después de la pandemia se mantendrían al mismo nivel. Además, se analizaron los predictores ambientales y demográficos de estos cambios. En mayo de 2020, una muestra de 626 terapeutas de sistemas familiares (el 58.6 % mujeres, el 40.6 % hombres, edad promedio=57.4 años; promedio de años en ejercicio de la profesión= 25.5) completó un estudio nacional en línea que evaluaba estas variables. Los resultados sugirieron que los terapeutas de sistemas familiares realizaron el 7.92 % de su trabajo clínico usando teleterapia antes de la pandemia y el 88.17 % durante la pandemia. También pronosticaron que harían un 36.57 % de su trabajo clínico usando teleterapia después de la pandemia. La adopción de la teleterapia no estuvo relacionada con el ámbito de práctica principal, ni con la edad, el género, la raza o la etnia de los profesionales, ni tampoco con el lugar de práctica (urbano o suburbano frente a rural), pero fue mayor entre los terapeutas de sistemas familiares que informaron un aumento de las políticas de apoyo de la teleterapia y de la capacitación en su ámbito de práctica. La infraestructura organizacional y la disponibilidad de capacitación jugaron un papel importante a la hora de influir en la adopción de la teleterapia durante la pandemia. Los terapeutas de sistemas familiares tienen una oportunidad única de implementar modalidades de teleterapia para atender las necesidades de las familias durante la pandemia de la COVID-19, y la infraestructura y la capacitación para hacerlo pueden facilitar ese trabajo.